Social Norms and Reward System Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention

Authors

  • Dr. H. C. Kothari Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, Shriram Institute of Management and Technology, Kashipur, U. S. Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26703/jct.v10i1.193

Keywords:

Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurial Intention, Social Norms, Chi-Square Test, T-Test

Abstract

This study is an attempt to identify social norms that affects the entrepreneurial intention in the entrepreneurially deficient
state uttarakhand. The empirical study is based on a sample of 880 graduation final year students studying in different
colleges of uttarakhand. On the basis of literature review and focus group interviews a questionnaire was prepared and
administered on the sample. Pearsion’s chi-square test was used to find out statistical relationship between the respondents
with and without entrepreneurial intention and their perception for social norms and student’s t-test was used to compare
mean score and significance of the results. Only two variables which are stated as, “maximum people want to do salaried job in our society” and “more often a person who is unable to get job, starts his/her business in our society” were found statistically significant. T-test also supports this finding. Only one variable which is asked as, “more often a person who is unable to get job, starts his/her business in our society” was found statistically significant. The mean value of the response for this item is also high for the respondents with non-entrepreneurial career choice than the respondents with entrepreneurial career choice. The findings of t-test used to examine the relationship between overall score of the social norms and career choice of the respondents, are also non
significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. Action Control From cognition

to behaviour ed by J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann pp. 11-39. Springer-Verlag.

Ajzen, I. and Fishbain, M. (1980). Understanding Attitude and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood

Cliffs, Prentice Hall.

Aris, S. (1970). The Jews in Business. London: Jonathan Cape.

Axelrod R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, vol 80 (4),

pp 1095-1111.

Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship- Productive, Unproductive and Destructive. Journal of Political

Economy, vol 98 (5), pp 893-921.

Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings and other factors affecting helping and altruism. Advances

in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 6, pp 63-108.

Birley, S. J. (1985).The Role of Networks in the Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Business Venturing,

vol 1 (1), pp 107-117.

Burt, R. (1992). The Social Structure of Competition, in Nitkin, N. and Eccler, R. (eds.), Networks and

Organisational Structure, Firm and Action, Bosbon, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Chell, E. (1988). Explorations of the entrepreneurial Personality: A Latent Class Analysis, Paper Presented

at the Second International Workshop on Recent Research on Entrepreneurship, Vienna: The University

of Economics. (Quoted by Manimala, 1999).

Cochran, T. C. (1965). The Entrepreneur in Economic Change. Exploration in Entrepreneurial History,

Vol 3 (1), pp 25-38.

Coleman J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Fishbein, M. And Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory

and Research, Reading, M A. Addition- Wesley.

Gadgil, D. R. (1959). Origins of the Modern Indian Business Class: An Interim Report, New York,

Institute of Pacific Relations.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Week Ties. American Journal of Sociology, vol 78, pp 1360-

Guha, A. (1970). Parsi Seths and Entrepreneurs: 1750-1850, Economics and Political Weekly, vol 5 (35),

pp 107-115.

Hagen, E. E. (1962). On the Theory of Social Change. Bombay: Vakil/Irwin.

Hechter M. and Borland, E. (2001). National self-determination: the emergence of an international norm.

Social Norms. pp. 186-233, Russell Sage Foundation New York.

Hills, G.; Lumpkin, G.; and Singh, R. (1997). Opportunity Recognition: Perception and Behaviour of

Entrepreneurs, in Reynolds, P. D. Bygrave, W. O.; Devidson, P.; Grtner, W. B.; Mason, C. M.; McDougall

P. P. (eds.). Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA: Babson College, pp 168-182.

Hozelitz, B. (1960). Sociological Aspect of Economic Growth, London: Collier McMillan.

Keefer P. and S. Knack (2006). Social capital, social norms and the institutional economics. World Bank

Policy Research Reports. Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINVTCLI/Resources/

socialcapitalsocialnorms.pdf

Kulke, E. (1974). The Process in India: A minority as Agent of Social Change, New Delhi, Vikas

Publication House.

Ortgard, T. and Birley, S. (1994). New Venture Growth and Personal Network. Journal of Business

Research, vol 36, pp 37-60.

Additional Files

Published

01-05-2015

How to Cite

Kothari, H. C. (2015). Social Norms and Reward System Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention. Journal of Commerce and Trade, 10(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.26703/jct.v10i1.193

Issue

Section

Research Paper